Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576805›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023

"No one went into pharmacy … to sell a lot of Coca-Cola. It's just sort of a necessary evil" - Community pharmacists' perceptions of front-of-store sales and ethical tensions in the retail environment.

Stephanie Gellatly, Alexander Moszczynski, Lean Fiedeldey, Sherilynn Houle, Maxwell Smith, Ubaka Ogbogu, Debbie Rudman, Leia Minaker, Jacob Shelley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephanie GellatlyFaculty of Law, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Alexander MoszczynskiFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A5B9, Canada.
Lean FiedeldeyFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A5B9, Canada.
Sherilynn HouleSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 10A Victoria St S, Kitchener, ON N2G 1C5, Canada.
Maxwell SmithFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A5B9, Canada.
Ubaka OgboguFaculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5, Canada.
Debbie RudmanSchool of Occupational Therapy, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.
Leia MinakerSchool of Planning, Faculty of Environment, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Jacob ShelleyFaculty of Law, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community pharmacists are expected to uphold ethical duties to patients and society while maintaining independent businesses or fulfilling expectations of corporate owners. Canadian pharmacy colleges provide only indirect guidance on the retail setting of the profession. Little is known about whether pharmacists identify ethical issues in retail pharmacy or around the sales of non-drug products. Objective: This study sought to examine pharmacists' perceptions of their roles in health promotion, the factors that influence the selection of front-of-store products, and ethical issues relating to their dual roles as health care providers and retailers. Methods: In 2020, 25 Canadian pharmacists participated in semi-structured phone interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, anonymized, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using qualitative methods. Results: Almost all participants described their role primarily as a health care provider, though some described themselves as 50-50 health care providers and retailers. Most staff pharmacists reported little control over front-of-store product selection. Where participants reported some control, external factors such as business viability and profitability impacted their choices, though some reported selecting products based on the needs of their patient community or their personal beliefs. The dominant tensions described stemmed from participants' dual roles as health care providers and retailers, though specific issues and situations were varied, ranging corporate targets, to service provision, to the sales of unproven or unhealthy products. Participants suggested solutions to the issues they described, ranging from a complete overhaul of the licensing structure of community pharmacies, down to one-on-one conversations with patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the retail setting of community pharmacy produces unique ethical tensions: the imposition of retail sales standards and targets are commonplace, and business viability is a primary driving force in front-of-store product selection. Clear guidance from Canadian pharmacy colleges and legislators to address these tensions and issues may be necessary.

Indexed as

Community pharmacyEthicsFront-of-store salesQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID37576805
PMCPMC10415799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.