Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576769›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2023

Quantitative risk assessment for human

Misheck A Mulilo, Kabemba E Mwape, Ethel M'kandawire, Ernatus M Mkupasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Misheck A MuliloLivestock Training Agency, Department of Training, Research and Consultancy, Mpwapwa, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Kabemba E MwapeDepartment of Clinical Studies, The University of Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Ethel M'kandawireDepartment of Disease Control, The University of Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Ernatus M MkupasiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Morogoro, Tanzania.
University of Zambia · ZMMinistry of Livestock and Fisheries · TZSokoine University of Agriculture · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Pig farming is a livelihood activity undertaken by many rural communities in Tanzania. However, pigs in rural communities become infected with Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study employing a quantitative risk assessment technique was conducted to quantify the risk of human infection in Mpwapwa District through exposure to Results: The risk of one getting exposed to Conclusion: The results from this study are anticipated to create public awareness of the problem and promote the use of one-health approach in the control and prevention of the consumption of infected pork.

Indexed as

cysticercosisMpwapwapork mealquantitative risk assessmenttaeniasisTaenia solium

Identifiers

PMID37576769
PMCPMC10420725
OpenAlexW4375861508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.