Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576755›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2023

Flow cytometric evaluation of CD4

Dwi Lestari, Sri Murtini, Niken Ulupi, Asep Gunawan, Cece Sumantri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cecal coccidiosis in Japanese quails (Open veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dwi LestariGraduate School of Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Sri MurtiniDepartment of Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Niken UlupiDepartment of Animal Disease and Veterinary Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Asep GunawanDepartment of Animal Disease and Veterinary Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Cece SumantriDepartment of Animal Disease and Veterinary Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
IPB University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: IPB-D2 chickens are selected from IPB-D1 due to their disease-resistance characteristics. One-way to evaluate the strength of a chicken's immune system is by examining the number of circulating T lymphocytes. This assessment can be conducted using a modern analytic method called flow cytometry which relies on monoclonal antibodies to detect the relative proportions of each cell and measure the quality and quantity of biological and physical features of cells, including specific membrane or intracellular glycoprotein markers. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the population of lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation (CD)4 Materials and Methods: Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the population of lymphocytes, CD4 Results: The lymphocytes, CD4 Conclusion: IPB-D2 chickens with high ND antibody titers exhibited increased lymphocyte, CD4

Indexed as

cluster of differentiation 4+cluster of differentiation 8+flow cytometryIPB-D2 chickenlymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID37576755
PMCPMC10420708
OpenAlexW4378981322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.