Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576722›Full record

ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2023

Adequacy of venous thromboembolism risk stratification and prophylaxis in a tertiary university hospital.

Edvaldo Luiz Ramalli, Marcelo Bellini Dalio, Maurício Serra Ribeiro, Edwaldo Edner Joviliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edvaldo Luiz RamalliUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Hospital das Clínicas, Divisão de Cirurgia Vascular e Endovascular, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Marcelo Bellini DalioUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Hospital das Clínicas, Divisão de Cirurgia Vascular e Endovascular, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-6825
Maurício Serra RibeiroUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Hospital das Clínicas, Divisão de Cirurgia Vascular e Endovascular, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Edwaldo Edner JovilianoUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Hospital das Clínicas, Divisão de Cirurgia Vascular e Endovascular, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism is the third most common cardiovascular disease and the main cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients. Prophylaxis is still underused, despite well-established guidelines in the literature. Studies show a worldwide prophylaxis adequacy rate close to 50%. Objectives: To assess the adequacy of risk stratification and prophylactic measures for venous thromboembolism in a tertiary university hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out, collecting data from medical records. Adult patients hospitalized by different specialties were enrolled and divided into surgical and clinical groups. The risk stratification of venous thromboembolism performed by the attending physicians was compared with stratification based on recent guidelines performed by the research physicians. Prophylaxis measures prescribed by the attending physicians were compared with guideline recommendations, thus obtaining the prophylaxis adequacy rate. Results: 400 patients were analyzed, 169 (42.3%) surgical and 231 (57.7%) clinical. The overall stratification adequacy rate was 50.8%. Adequacy rates were 39.1% and 59.3% in the surgical and clinical groups respectively (P < 0.0001). The overall prophylaxis adequacy rate was 71.5%, with 78.1% in the surgical group and 66.7% in the clinical group (P=0.0137). Conclusions: Risk stratification adequacy is low, demonstrating a low awareness among prescribing physicians of the need for adequate stratification for prescription of prophylaxis. However, the prophylaxis prescription adequacy rates are higher than those in global data.

Indexed as

deep vein thrombosisdisease preventionpulmonary embolismrisk factorsvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID37576722
PMCPMC10421582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.