Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576569›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2023

On mathematical modeling of the propagation of a wave ensemble within an individual axon.

Tanel Peets, Kert Tamm, Jüri Engelbrecht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanel PeetsDepartment of Cybernetics, School of Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Kert TammDepartment of Cybernetics, School of Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Jüri EngelbrechtDepartment of Cybernetics, School of Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long history of studying the propagation of an action potential has revealed that an electrical signal is accompanied by mechanical and thermal effects. All these effects together generate an ensemble of waves. The consistent models of such a complex phenomenon can be derived by using properly the fundamental physical principles. In this paper, attention is paid to the analysis of concepts of continuum physics that constitute a basis for deriving the mathematical models which describe the emergence and propagation of a wave ensemble in an axon. Such studies are interdisciplinary and based on biology, physics, mathematics, and chemistry. The governing equations for the action potential together with mechanical and thermal effects are derived starting from basics: Maxwell equations, conservation of momentum, Fourier's law, etc., but modified following experimental studies in electrophysiology. Several ideas from continuum physics like external forces and internal variables can also be used in deriving the corresponding models. Some mathematical concepts used in modeling are also briefly described. A brief overview of several mathematical models is presented that allows us to analyze the present ideas of modeling. Most mathematical models deal with the propagation of signals in a healthy axon. Further analysis is needed for better modeling the pathological situations and the explanation of the influence of the structural details like the myelin sheath or the cytoskeleton in the axoplasm. The future possible trends in improving the models are envisaged.

Indexed as

accompanying effectsaction potentialinterdisciplinarylaws of physicsmodeling

Identifiers

PMID37576569
PMCPMC10416108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.