ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023
The Safety and Efficacy of Prolonged Use of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Patients with Pulmonary Multi-Drug Resistant/Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Prospective, Cohort Study in China.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Interim Effectiveness and Safety of Prolonged Bedaquiline Use in Comparison to Standard 24-Week Treatment for MDR-TB: A Multicenter Cohort Study in China.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of prolonged bedaquiline course in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis-a multi-center retrospective cohort study in a country with a high burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Article
- Treatment Outcomes and Associated Influencing Factors Among Patients with Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study in China.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of prolonged bedaquiline (Bdq) treatment in patients with multi-drug/rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). Methods: This prospective cohort study was performed from August 2018 to August 2021. Patients diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively included. Patients were treated with individual regimens of 18-20 months containing Bdq for six months or a prolonged course of nine or 12 months according to treatment demands, and the efficacy and safety with a different course of Bdq-containing regimens were compared and evaluated. Results: A total of 159 MDR/RR-TB patients were included in the study, including 96 cases with six months of Bdq, 50 cases with nine months of Bdq, and 13 patients with 12 months of Bdq. The treatment success rates were 89.6%, 90%, and 84.6% in Bdq at six months, nine months, and 12 months, respectively, which were not statistically different (P = 0.85). The main adverse events (AEs) were anemia, thrombocytopenia, and liver dysfunction in all patients, with no significant difference among the three groups. Patients who had fewer drugs chosen, disseminated lesions or lesions that were slowly absorbed, and severe cavities were the common reasons for prolonged use of Bdq. Conclusion: Prolonged course use of Bdq from six months to 12 months clinically proved to be safe and efficient, and patients with severe or disseminated lesions had the chance to prolong the use of Bdq for more than six months to achieve optimal treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.