Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576493›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Implementation of artificial intelligence for the detection of cutaneous melanoma within a primary care setting: prevalence and types of skin cancer in outdoor enthusiasts.

Ian J Miller, Michael Stapelberg, Nedeljka Rosic, Jeremy Hudson, Paul Coxon, James Furness, Joe Walsh, Mike Climstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Self-skin Examination for Skin Cancer Detection in High-risk Populations: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study and Implications for Cancer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AI and Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ian J MillerAquatic Based Research, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1372-7626
Michael StapelbergAquatic Based Research, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.
Nedeljka RosicAquatic Based Research, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.
Jeremy HudsonAquatic Based Research, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.
Paul CoxonNorth Queensland Skin Centre, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
James FurnessWater Based Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7773-0253
Joe WalshSport Science Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-934X
Mike ClimsteinAquatic Based Research, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5833-7760
Southern Cross University · AUBond University · AUTownsville Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is enthusiasm for implementing artificial intelligence (AI) to assist clinicians detect skin cancer. Performance metrics of AI from dermoscopic images have been promising, with studies documenting sensitivity and specificity values equal to or superior to specialists for the detection of malignant melanomas (MM). Early detection rates would particularly benefit Australia, which has the worlds highest incidence of MM Methods: Cross-sectional study design incorporating a survey, total body skin cancer screening and AI-embedded software capable of predictive scoring of queried MM. Results: A total of 423 participants consisting of surfers ( Conclusions: Rates of both keratinocyte carcinomas and MM were notably higher in aquatic and land-based enthusiasts compared to the general Australian population. These findings further highlight the clinical importance of sun-safe protection measures and regular skin screening in individuals who spend significant time outdoors. The use of AI in the early identification of MM is promising. However, the lower-than-expected performance metrics of the AI software used in this study indicated reservations should be held before recommending this particular version of this AI software as a reliable adjunct for clinicians in skin imaging diagnostics in patients with potentially sun damaged skin.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansPrevalencePrimary Health CareUltraviolet RaysArtificial intelligenceKeratinocyte carcinomaMelanomaPhysical activityQuestionnaireSkin neoplasmSurfSwimUltraviolet radiationWalk

Identifiers

PMID37576493
PMCPMC10416769
OpenAlexW4385663836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.