Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576321›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Selection of the final solid waste disposal site in the Bolgatanga municipality of Ghana using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria evaluation (MCE).

Steve Ampofo, Joan Sana Issifu, Michael Mba Kusibu, Asaah Sumaila Mohammed, Freda Adiali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steve AmpofoDepartment of Environmental Science, School of Environment and Life Sciences (SELS), C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences (CKT-UTAS), P. O. Box 24, Navrongo, Ghana.
Joan Sana IssifuDepartment of Environmental Science, School of Environment and Life Sciences (SELS), C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences (CKT-UTAS), P. O. Box 24, Navrongo, Ghana.
Michael Mba KusibuDepartment of Environmental Science, School of Environment and Life Sciences (SELS), C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences (CKT-UTAS), P. O. Box 24, Navrongo, Ghana.
Asaah Sumaila MohammedDepartment of Environmental Science, School of Environment and Life Sciences (SELS), C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences (CKT-UTAS), P. O. Box 24, Navrongo, Ghana.
Freda AdialiDepartment of Environmental Science, School of Environment and Life Sciences (SELS), C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences (CKT-UTAS), P. O. Box 24, Navrongo, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The various components of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) such as collection, sorting, transportation, and disposal have their peculiarities and challenges. However, final disposal sites, generally referred to as landfill sites, present a complex difficulty. The aggregation of the problems of other components has consequences on the microenvironment, public health, and groundwater. Final disposal of MSW, site selection, and management presents an enormous burden for most Metropolitan, Municipal, and District Assembly (s) in Ghana. The case of Bolgatanga Municipality is similar to many others in the Upper East region in particular and Ghana as a whole. The existing landfill site is improperly sited and poses a great danger to adjoining communities. In this work, we used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in a G.I.S. suite and Multi-Criteria Evaluation to assess the current location and select a possible new site within the municipality. The criteria used are generally environmental and socio-economic parameters, including; distance from major roads, rivers, settlements, and the selection of an appropriate slope and soil type that suits the guidelines for the siting of a landfill. The outcome of this multi-criteria assessment is the selection of a new site far from the current disposal site indicating the inappropriate location of the current site. A combination of all weighted criteria through a model builder process produced a suitability index map for candidate landfill sites. The selected site at Sherigu is about 16 km by road from the proposed site, which is much bigger than the threshold of 500 sq. meters. The separation distance and size between the current and the proposed site are indications of how economically and environmentally inappropriate the Sherigu site is and the need for a better site that is better situated for socio-economic and environmental considerations.

Indexed as

Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)BolgatangaLandfillMulti-criteria evaluation (MCE)Municipal solid waste (MSW)

Identifiers

PMID37576321
PMCPMC10413006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.