Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576318›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Medical emergency department triage data processing using a machine-learning solution.

Andreea Vântu, Anca Vasilescu, Alexandra Băicoianu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. February 6Turkish journal of emergency medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andreea VântuFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Braşov, Romania.
Anca VasilescuDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Braşov, Romania.
Alexandra BăicoianuDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Braşov, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, artificial intelligence has demonstrated its ability to overcome many challenges in our day-to-day life. The evolution of it inquired more studies about Machine Learning possible solutions for different domains, including health care. The increasing demand for artificial intelligence solutions has brought accessibility to loads of data, including clinical data. The availability of medical records facilitates new opportunities to explore Machine Learning models and their abilities to process a significant amount of data and to identify patterns with the purpose of solving a medical problem. Understanding the applicability of artificial intelligence on this type of data has to be a compelling aim for emergency medicine clinicians. This paper focuses on the general clinical problem of the complex correlation between medical records and later diagnosis and, especially, on the process of emergency department triage which uses the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) as triage protocol. This study presents a comparison between three different Machine Learning models, such as Logistic Regression, Random Forest Tree and NN-Sequentail, with the purpose of classifying patients with an emergency code. We conducted four experiments because of imbalanced data. A web-based application was developed to improve the triage process after our theoretical and exploratory results. Overall, in all experiments, the NN-Sequential model had better results, having, in the first experiment, a ROC-AUC score for each ESI emergency code of: 0.59%, 0.76%, 0.71%, 0.78% 0.64%. After applying methods to balance the data, the model yielded a ROC-AUC score for each emergency code of 0.72%, 0.75%, 0.69%, 0.74%, 0.78%. In the last experiment consisting of a three-class classification problem, the NN-Sequential and Random Forest Tree models had similar metric outcomes, and the NN-Sequential algorithm had a ROC-AUC score for each emergency code of: 0.76%, 0.72%, 0.84%. Without any doubt, our research results presented in this paper endorse this tremendous curiosity in Machine Learning applications to enrich aspects of emergency medical care by applying specific methods for processing both medical data and medical records.

Indexed as

Clinical decision supportEmergency medicineMachine learningMedical data processingPatient medical recordSupervised learning algorithmsTriage

Identifiers

PMID37576318
PMCPMC10412878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.