Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576250›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Root growth and physiological responses in wheat to topsoil and subsoil compaction with or without artificial vertical macropores.

Surajit Mondal, Debashis Chakraborty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Surajit MondalDivision of Agricultural Physics, ICAR Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Debashis ChakrabortyDivision of Agricultural Physics, ICAR Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of soil compaction can cause various stresses on roots, ultimately limiting their growth and development within the soil. Understanding this phenomenon in real-world conditions can be challenging since the growth of roots is influenced by the soil environment. To investigate this issue, four experiments were conducted to examine the impact of topsoil (two in pots: with clay loam and sandy loam soils under two soil water regimes) and subsoil (in rhizobox: one with clay loam soil and the other with sandy loam soil, containing artificial vertical macropores) compaction on the relationship between edaphic factors and the physiological response of wheat roots. The topsoil compaction reduced root length, volume, and weight by 30-50% and the root diameter by ∼15% compared to the non-compact soil. The effect was reduced in the soil with higher clay content (clay loam), especially under the limited soil water condition. Plant physiological responses were adversely affected by compaction with a reduction in plant height. The transpiration rate was highly impacted (21-47% reduction) with the build-up of intercellular CO

Indexed as

MacroporesRhizoboxRoot diameterRoot lengthSoil textureSoil water

Identifiers

PMID37576250
PMCPMC10415892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.