ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Integrative single-cell analysis of cardiac and pulmonary sarcoidosis using publicly available cardiac and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sequencing datasets.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated DNA methylome and transcriptome signatures of lung CD4ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Single cell transcriptome signatures and cell-cell interactions associated with sarcoidosis in lung immune cell populations.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Cardiac sarcoidosis: from clinical manifestations to heart transplantation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Whole-heart 3D reconstruction of mouse CVB3 myocarditis reveals spatial and transcriptomic heterogeneity of immune foci.Cardiovascular research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac presentation of autoimmune sarcoidosis, known as cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), is a poorly understood disease with high mortality and low diagnosis rate. While CS is an immunological syndrome, little is known about how cardiac parenchymal and stromal cells mediate its pathogenesis. Moreover, while most current sarcoidosis research is based on research in pulmonary sarcoidosis (PS), it remains unclear how much both presentations of sarcoidosis overlap. To tackle these concerns, we leveraged publicly available sarcoidosis transcriptomic datasets. Methods: Two publicly available bronchoalveolar lavage single-cell RNA sequencing datasets were integrated to analyze PS relative to control. Additionally, two publicly available cardiac single-nucleus RNA sequencing datasets were integrated to analyze CS relative to control. Following integration, we ran cell-cell communication, transcription factor, and differential expression analyses on parenchymal, stromal, and immune subsets identified in our analysis. Results: Our analysis revealed that there was an expansion of stromal and immune cells in PS and CS. We also observed upregulation of Th17.1 and attenuated activation transcriptional profiles in the immune cells of CS and PS relative to control. Additionally, we found upregulation of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic transcriptional profiles in the cardiac stromal cells of CS relative to control. We also found that cardiomyocytes exhibited upregulated cardiac stress and proliferation transcriptional profiles in CS relative to control. Conclusions: Our integrative transcriptomic analysis shows that despite tissue-specific differences, there are shared transcriptional trends between CS and PS. It also shows that stromal and parenchymal populations exhibit transcriptional trends that could explain their pathogenic role in CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.