ArticleJournal of medical physics
Role of Optimal Features Selection with Machine Learning Algorithms for Chest X-ray Image Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable multi-center machine learning model driven by facial image features for non-invasive early risk assessment of lung cancer.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Genetic Algorithms for Feature Selection in the Classification of COVID-19 Patients.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of the present study is to classify chest X-ray (CXR) images into COVID-positive and normal categories with the optimal number of features extracted from the images. The successful optimal feature selection algorithm that can represent images and the classification algorithm with good classification ability has been determined as the result of experiments. Materials and Methods: This study presented a framework for the automatic detection of COVID-19 from the CXR images. To enhance small details, textures, and contrast of the images, contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization was used. Features were extracted from the first-order statistics, Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix, Gray-Level Run Length Matrix, local binary pattern, Law's Texture Energy Measures, Discrete Wavelet Transform, and Zernikes' Moments using an image feature extraction tool "pyFeats. For the feature selection, three nature-inspired optimization algorithms, Grey Wolf Optimization, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Genetic Algorithm, were used. For classification, Random Forest classifier, K-Nearest Neighbour classifier, support vector machine (SVM) classifier, and light gradient boosting model classifier were used. Results and Discussion: For all the feature selection methods, the SVM classifier gives the most accurate and precise result compared to other classification models. Furthermore, in feature selection methods, PSO gives the best result as compared to other methods for feature selection. Using the combination of the SVM classifier with the PSO method, it was observed that the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were 100%. Conclusion: The result of the study indicates that with optimal features with the best choice of the classifier algorithm, the most accurate computer-aided diagnosis of CXR can be achieved. The approach presented in this study with optimal features may be utilized as a complementary tool to assist the radiologist in the early diagnosis of disease and making a more accurate decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.