ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023
Coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal thoracic arteries in patients with diabetes and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: A 35-year experience.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Association Between Serum Lipid-Bilirubin Ratio and Clinical Prognosis Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- All arterial versus non-total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2025Review
- Recent highlights from the International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature: cardiometabolic disease.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- A novel vascular stent and insert concept to improve hemodynamics and support vascular health.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Improved early risk stratification of deep sternal wound infection risk after coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Outcomes after surgical revascularization in diabetic patients.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Recent highlights on coronary artery disease from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
- Bilateral internal mammary arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting: One size does not fit all.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patients with diabetes and obesity are at higher risk of adverse long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting. The use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) can potentially offer survival benefit in higher risk patients compared to single internal thoracic artery (SITA), but BITA is not routinely used due to lack of clear evidence of efficacy and concerns over sternal wound complications. Methods: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing the efficacy and safety of BITA and SITA grafting in patients with diabetes and obesity. Meta-analysis of mortality and sternal wound complications was performed. Results: We identified eight observational and ten propensity matched studies, and one RCT, comparing BITA and SITA which included patients with diabetes (n = 19,589); two propensity matched studies and one RCT which included patients with obesity (n = 6,972); mean follow up was 10.5 and 11.3 years respectively. Meta-analysis demonstrated a mortality reduction for BITA compared to SITA in patients with diabetes (risk ratio [RR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.90; p = 0.0003). In patients with obesity there was a non-significant reduction in mortality in the BITA group (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.47-1.12; p = 0.15). There was a significantly higher rate of sternal wound complications following BITA observed in patients with diabetes (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.23-1.90; p = 0.0001) and obesity (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.63-3.07; p < 0.00001). Conclusions: BITA is associated with better long-term survival in patients with diabetes. The effects of BITA grafting in patients with obesity are uncertain. BITA is associated with higher rates of sternal wound complications compared to SITA in both patients with diabetes and obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.