ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2023
A time-resolved clonogenic assay for improved cell survival and RBE measurements.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The in vitro clonogenic assay (IVCA) is the mainstay of quantitative radiobiology. Here, we investigate the benefit of a time-resolved IVCA version (trIVCA) to improve the quantification of clonogenic survival and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) by analyzing cell colony growth behavior. Materials & Methods: In the IVCA, clonogenicity classification of cell colonies is performed based on a fixed colony size threshold after incubation. In contrast, using trIVCA, we acquire time-lapse microscopy images during incubation and track the growth of each colony using neural-net-based image segmentation. Attributes of the resulting growth curves are then used as predictors for a decision tree classifier to determine clonogenicity of each colony. The method was applied to three cell lines, each irradiated with 250 kV X-rays in the range 0-8 Gy and carbon ions of high LET (100 keV/μm, dose-averaged) in the range 0-2 Gy. We compared the cell survival curves determined by trIVCA to those from the classical IVCA across different size thresholds and incubation times. Further, we investigated the impact of the assaying method on RBE determination. Results: Size distributions of abortive and clonogenic colonies overlap consistently, rendering perfect separation via size threshold unfeasible at any readout time. This effect is dose-dependent, systematically inflating the steepness and curvature of cell survival curves. Consequently, resulting cell survival estimates show variability between 3% and 105%. This uncertainty propagates into RBE calculation with variability between 8% and 25% at 2 Gy.Determining clonogenicity based on growth curves has an accuracy of 95% on average. Conclusion: The IVCA suffers from substantial uncertainty caused by the overlap of size distributions of delayed abortive and clonogenic colonies. This impairs precise quantification of cell survival and RBE. By considering colony growth over time, our method improves assaying clonogenicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.