Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37575986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Work climate from the perspective of nurses: qualitative research.

Justyna Kosydar-Bochenek, Sabina Krupa, Tomasz Semań, Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justyna Kosydar-BochenekInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences of the University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland.
Sabina KrupaInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences of the University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland.
Tomasz SemańInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Wioletta Mędrzycka-DąbrowskaDepartment of Anesthesiology Nursing and Intensive Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to determine the nurses' view of the work climate. A positive work climate is one of the keys determining factors in improving nurse outcomes and affects patient satisfaction with care. Methods: In this qualitative research, a semi-structured interview was used to understand nurses' perceptions of their work environment. The participants' responses were recorded and transcribed. Between November and December 2021, 22 nurses participated in the study. Purposive sampling was used to choose nurses for the research, and interviews were performed with these nurses utilizing a semi-structured interview form. The interviews were analyzed using a theme analysis. Results: The themes identified in the data centered on four dominant elements that together shaped the prevailing work climate: participation in making decisions, companionship, job satisfaction, and changes they expect. Conclusion: It is necessary to implement meetings at the level of departments and hospitals, where employees will receive support from the authorities and learn how they can improve the working climate. Implications for nursing management: Research findings on the working climate can help hospital managers makers design interventions to create a good working environment for nurses.

Indexed as

feelings of nursesnursesorganizational climatequalitative researchwork climatework environmentworkplace climate

Identifiers

PMID37575986
PMCPMC10416441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.