ArticleTranslational pediatrics2023
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Early-Onset Scoliosis Self-Report Questionnaire in children aged 8 to 18 years with early-onset scoliosis.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Early-Onset Scoliosis Self-Report Questionnaire (EOSQ-SELF) is a novel self-report instrument to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients, as a complementary HRQoL assessment tool for the proxy-repot 24-item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). This study aimed to translate and adapt the EOSQ-SELF into a Chinese version and evaluate its reliability and validity in EOS patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed from July 2022 to September 2022. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with EOS were recruited. Forwards-backwards translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original EOSQ-SELF were performed. The Chinese EOSQ-SELF was administered and collected twice through social media, with a 2 weeks interval. Reliability was evaluated by using internal consistency, and test-retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of data between the two time points. A Delphi survey in the expert committee was used to investigate the content validity. SRS-22r, PedsQL4.0, and EQ-5D-Y scales were used to assess the criterion-related validity. Nonparametric tests and multiple linear regression were performed to evaluate the discriminative ability. Results: A total of 101 valid responses from EOS patients were received. The mean age was 12.08±2.19 years, and 53.47% were female. The mean Cobb angle was 60.56°±19.48°. Floor effects of 0.00% to 7.92% and ceiling effects of 0.00% to 52.48% were observed. Excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Chinese EOSQ-SELF was observed, with a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.942, McDonald's ω coefficient of 0.940, and ICC of 0.930. All domains of the Chinese EOSQ-SELF were significantly correlated with SRS-22r (0.709 to 0.878), PedsQL4.0 (0.568 to 0.718), and EQ-5D-Y (-0.598 to -0.625), depicting excellent criterion-related validity. Discriminative ability was validated in aetiology (P<0.001), severity of spinal deformity (P<0.001), treatment status (P<0.001), and ambulatory ability (P<0.001). Conclusions: The Chinese EOSQ-SELF is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of self-report HRQoL in patients aged 8 to 18 years with EOS. It can be easily applied in clinical settings and for research purposes, as a complementary tool for the proxy-report EOSQ-24.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.