ArticleCureus2023
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Children: Nine Years' Experience at Santa Fe Foundation in Bogota, Colombia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Post Endoscopy Cholecystectomies in Pediatric Population-Longitudinal, Nationwide Data from Poland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of pediatric pancreatobiliary diseases.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Prevention of Bacterial Infection in Biliary and Pancreatic Endoscopy-A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExperience in the use of diagnostic and/or therapy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in children is limited. This is due to the underdiagnosis of pancreaticobiliary disease in the pediatric population and specialist personnel in this procedure.
objectiveTo determine the safety and success rate of ERCP in children at Hospital Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá between January 2007 and June 2015. METHODOLOGY: This was an observational, descriptive, retrospective case series study of patients under 18 years, who underwent ERCP between January 2007 and June 2015. The following variables were analyzed: indication, duration, type of procedure, rate of success, and complications.
resultsA total of 30 patients were included, in whom 65 ERCP procedures were performed. Successful cannulation was achieved in 52 of the 65 procedures (80%). Among the complications that occurred, there were four cases of pancreatitis (6.2%), two cases of bleeding (3.1%), and one case of bacteremia (1.5%), and in most cases (58 in total, 89.2%), there were no complications. DISCUSSION: The pediatric gastroenterology group of the Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá has obtained good results in performing ERCP in the pediatric population with a success rate of 80% associated with a null mortality rate. There is enough literature available to conclude that performing ERCP in the pediatric population maintains an adequate success rate and a low complication rate. In all the studies evaluated, a null mortality rate was found, so it is considered that this procedure is safe in patients under 18 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.