Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37575744›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Practice of Pancreatoduodenectomy in India: A Nation-Wide Survey.

Gourav Kaushal, Nirjhar Raj Rakesh, Anvin Mathew, Sumit Sanyal, Abhishek Agrawal, Puneet Dhar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feeding jejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Benefit or burden?Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gourav KaushalSurgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.
Nirjhar Raj RakeshSurgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Anvin MathewSurgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Sumit SanyalSurgical Gastroenterology, Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Kolkata, IND.
Abhishek AgrawalSurgical Gastroenterology, Amrita School of Medicine, Faridabad, IND.
Puneet DharSurgical Gastroenterology, Amrita School of Medicine, Faridabad, IND.
Asian Institute of Medical Sciences · INCentral University of Punjab · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The way pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is performed can vary a lot around the world, and there is no agreed-upon standard approach. To learn more about how PD is practised in India, a survey was conducted among Indian surgeons to gather information about their current practices. Methods A survey was created and shared with surgeons in India who practice pancreatic surgery. It had 33 questions that aimed to capture information about different aspects of PD practice. These questions covered topics such as the surgeons' education and experience, how they evaluated patients before surgery, what they considered during the operation, and how they managed patients after surgery. Results A total of 129 surgeons were sent the survey, and 110 of them completed it. The results showed that 40.9% of the surgeons had less than five years of experience, and 36.4% of them performed more than 15 PDs in a year. When deciding whether to perform preoperative biliary drainage, 60% of surgeons based their decision on the level of bilirubin in the patient's blood, while the rest considered other specific indications. The majority of surgeons (72.7%) looked at the trend of albumin levels to assess the patient's nutritional status before surgery. Venous infiltration was seen as a reason for neoadjuvant therapy by 76.4% of the participants, whereas 95.5% considered upfront surgery in cases of venous abutment. When it came to the type of PD, 40% preferred classical PD, 40.9% preferred pylorus-resecting PD (PRPD), and the rest chose pylorus-preserving PD (PPPD). Pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) was the preferred method for 77.3% of surgeons, while 6.3% preferred pancreatogastrostomy (PG). About 65.5% of surgeons used octreotide selectively during the operation when the duct diameter was small. Nearly all surgeons (94.5%) preferred to secure feeding access during PD, and all of them placed intraperitoneal drains. As for postoperative care, 37.3% of surgeons attempted early oral feeding within 48 hours, while 28.2% preferred to wait at least 48 hours before initiating oral feeds. Conclusions The survey revealed significant differences in how PD is practised among surgeons in India, highlighting the heterogeneity in their approaches and preferences.

Indexed as

carcinoma pancreashepato-pancreato-biliary surgeryindian association of surgical gastroenterologyindian association of surgical oncologypancreaspancreatic cancerpancreatoduodenectomywhipples operation

Identifiers

PMID37575744
PMCPMC10423016
OpenAlexW4384197590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.