Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37575380›Full record

ArticleActa medica Lituanic2023

Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage.

Eleni Karlafti, Athanasios Anagnostis, Theodora Simou, Angeliki Sevasti Kollatou, Daniel Paramythiotis, Georgia Kaiafa, Triantafyllos Didaggelos, Christos Savvopoulos, Varvara Fyntanidou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Lituanic, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The effects of applying artificial intelligence to triage in the emergency department: A systematic review of prospective studies.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eleni KarlaftiEmergency Department, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 55636, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Athanasios AnagnostisAdvanced Insights, Artificial Intelligence Solutions, Ipsilantou 10, Panorama, 55236 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Theodora SimouFirst Propaedeutic Internal Medicine Department, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 55636, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Angeliki Sevasti KollatouFirst Propaedeutic Internal Medicine Department, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 55636, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Daniel ParamythiotisFirst Propaedeutic Surgery Department, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 55636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Georgia KaiafaFirst Propaedeutic Internal Medicine Department, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 55636, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Triantafyllos DidaggelosFirst Propaedeutic Internal Medicine Department, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 55636, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Christos SavvopoulosFirst Propaedeutic Internal Medicine Department, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 55636, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Varvara FyntanidouEmergency Department, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 55636, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In the Emergency Departments (ED) the current triage systems that are been implemented are based completely on medical education and the perception of each health professional who is in charge. On the other hand, cutting-edge technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be incorporated into healthcare systems, supporting the healthcare professionals' decisions, and augmenting the performance of triage systems. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficiency of AI to support triage in ED. Patients–Methods: The study included 332 patients from whom 23 different variables related to their condition were collected. From the processing of patient data for input variables, it emerged that the average age was 56.4 ± 21.1 years and 50.6% were male. The waiting time had an average of 59.7 ± 56.3 minutes while 3.9% ± 0.1% entered the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In addition, qualitative variables related to the patient's history and admission clinics were used. As target variables were taken the days of stay in the hospital, which were on average 1.8 ± 5.9, and the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) for which the following distribution applies: ESI: 1, patients: 2; ESI: 2, patients: 18; ESI: 3, patients: 197; ESI: 4, patients: 73; ESI: 5, patients: 42. Results: To create an automatic patient screening classifier, a neural network was developed, which was trained based on the data, so that it could predict each patient's ESI based on input variables.The classifier achieved an overall accuracy (F1 score) of 72.2% even though there was an imbalance in the classes. Conclusions: The creation and implementation of an AI model for the automatic prediction of ESI, highlighted the possibility of systems capable of supporting healthcare professionals in the decision-making process. The accuracy of the classifier has not reached satisfactory levels of certainty, however, the performance of similar models can increase sharply with the collection of more data.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencepatient triage

Identifiers

PMID37575380
PMCPMC10417017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.