Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37574846›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2024

Learnings from a prison-based drug treatment program on planning for release: A qualitative study.

Bebe D'Souza, Tony Butler, Anthony Shakeshaft, Ivan Calder, Katherine Conigrave, Michael Doyle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bebe D'SouzaSydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Tony ButlerSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-2769
Anthony ShakeshaftNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Indigenous Health and Alcohol, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ivan CalderHealth through Walls, New York, USA.
Katherine ConigraveDrug Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6428-1441
Michael DoyleNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Indigenous Health and Alcohol, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-8575
The University of Sydney · AUHigh Throughput Biology (United States) · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Centre of Research Excellence in Indigenous Health and Alcohol APP1117198National Health and Medical Research Council APP1193617National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellowship APP1123456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrison-based drug and alcohol group treatment programs operate in all Australian jurisdictions. With more than two-thirds of people in prison having a history of substance use prior to incarceration, such programs are needed. There have been few published papers on the impact of attending group treatment programs in Australian prisons, and the research published to date has been predominately quantitative. We aim to report the experiences of males in prison who completed and those who did not complete a group-based drug and alcohol program, to gain insight into their strategies for reducing harm from drug and alcohol post-release.

methodsQualitative thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with 12 males who completed or were about to complete and 10 males who discontinued a prison-based group drug and alcohol treatment program.

resultsProgram completers were more likely to have well-developed plans to reduce drug and alcohol harms and maintain abstinence upon return to the community, which included creating healthier social networks. They also showed stronger insights into the factors that led to offending. Those who did not complete the drug and alcohol program appeared to rely on self-will as the main way to reduce drug and alcohol harms, with less awareness of options for support services to reduce or stop drug and alcohol use. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsPrison-based drug and alcohol program engagement imparted useful information for program completers. Controlled trials are needed to examine whether such differences equate to improved outcomes after release.

Indexed as

PrisonersSubstance-Related DisordersAustraliaHumansMalePrisonsalcoholgroup treatmentillicit drugsprisonrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37574846
PMCPMC10952750
OpenAlexW4385798857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.