Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37574796›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026

Transarterial embolization and transvenous embolization for transverse-sigmoid sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous reflux: A comparative study.

Tetsuya Tsukada, Takashi Izumi, Masahiro Nishihori, Yoshio Araki, Kenji Uda, Kinya Yokoyama, Ryuta Saito

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tetsuya TsukadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0332-2596
Takashi IzumiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Masahiro NishihoriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Yoshio ArakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Kenji UdaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Kinya YokoyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Ryuta SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) with cortical venous reflux (CVR) carry a high risk for neurological sequelae or death. Recently, transverse-sigmoid sinus DAVFs were shown as good indications for transarterial embolization (TAE) with ONYX. Here, we compared the effectiveness and safety of conventional transvenous embolization (TVE) with those of TAE with ONYX for transverse-sigmoid sinus DAVFs with CVR.MethodsSixty-one patients with transverse-sigmoid sinus DAVFs were treated from April 2013 to May 2020. Among them, 37 patients with CVR were included. Transarterial embolization and TVE were compared in terms of complete occlusion and residual CVR immediately after treatment, complications with worsening modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥ 1, amount of contrast media used during treatment, radiation exposure, and surgical procedure time.ResultsTen patients were treated with 10 TAEs using ONYX and 27 patients with 29 TVEs. Transarterial embolization and TVE showed no differences in the overall complete occlusion rate (80% [8/10 patients] vs. 80% [23/27], respectively), whereas the residual rate of existing CVR was 10% (1/10 patient) vs. 3.4% (1/27) in the TAE and TVE groups, respectively. No complications with worsening mRS ≥1 occurred in either group. Among the parameters of amount of contrast media, radiation dose, and operative time, only radiation dose in the TAE group was lower than that in the TVE group (median: 2239 mGy vs. 3268 mGy, respectively;

Indexed as

Central Nervous System Vascular MalformationsEmbolization, TherapeuticTransverse SinusesAdultAgedCerebral AngiographyContrast MediaCranial SinusesDimethyl SulfoxideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolyvinylsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaDimethyl SulfoxideOnyx copolymerPolyvinylsDural arteriovenous fistulastransarterial embolizationtransvenous embolizationtransverse-sigmoid sinus

Identifiers

PMID37574796
PMCPMC12852591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.