Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37574594›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2023

Shift from older- to newer-generation antiseizure medications in people with acute ischemic stroke in Australia: A population-based study.

Stella Jung-Hyun Kim, Stephen Wood, Clara Marquina, Emma Foster, J Simon Bell, Jenni Ilomäki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stella Jung-Hyun KimCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5052-1195
Stephen WoodCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9256-2216
Clara MarquinaCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2582-0374
Emma FosterCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8958-3844
J Simon BellCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6115-2767
Jenni IlomäkiCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0348-9441
Monash University · AUMonash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the trends in antiseizure medications (ASMs) use following ischemic stroke and to examine factors associated with use of newer- and older-generation ASMs.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using state-wide linked health datasets. Patients who were hospitalized with a first-ever ischemic stroke between 2013 and 2017 and were dispensed ASM within 12 months from discharge were included. Logistic regression was used to examine the predictors of receiving newer-generation ASMs. Generalized linear modeling was used to identify factors associated with ASM use after ischemic stroke.

resultsOf 19 601 people hospitalized with a first-ever ischemic stroke, 989 were dispensed an ASM within 12 months from discharge. The most prevalent first ASMs were levetiracetam (38.0%), valproate (25.8%), and carbamazepine (10.3%). Most people were dispensed ASM monotherapy (86.9%). There was a shift toward the use of newer-generation ASMs between 2013 and 2017 (odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92-4.16). Metropolitan residents were more likely to be dispensed newer-generation ASMs as a first-line treatment (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.31-2.45). People over 85 years (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.64), with dementia (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.63) and psychotic comorbidities (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.96) were less likely to be dispensed newer-generation ASMs. Older age (coefficient [β] 0.23, P = 0.030), history of beta blocker use (β 0.17, P = 0.029), multiple ASMs (β 0.78, P < 0.001), and newer-generation ASM (β 0.23, P = 0.001) were associated with higher defined daily dose (DDD) of ASM whereas female sex and being married were associated with lower DDD. SIGNIFICANCE: There has been a shift toward newer-generation ASMs for poststroke seizures and epilepsy. Concerningly, vulnerable patient groups were more likely to be dispensed older-generation ASMs. This may lead to unnecessary exposure to adverse events and drug-drug interactions. Further research is needed to evaluate comparative effectiveness and safety of newer- and older-generation ASMs in poststroke populations.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeAustraliaBenzodiazepinesFemaleHumansResearchRetrospective StudiesBenzodiazepinesantiseizure medicationdrug utilizationischemic strokepost-stroke seizure

Identifiers

PMID37574594
PMCPMC10690710
OpenAlexW4385792625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.