ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023
Deep learning based automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk for 0.35 T MRgRT of lung tumors.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-fraction prior learning for scalable organ-at-risk segmentation in abdominal MR-guided radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Implementation and clinical evaluation of an in-house thoracic auto-segmentation model for 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Automated Ventricle and Periventricular Space Segmentation on CT and T1CE MRI in Neuro-Oncology Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Personalized deep learning auto-segmentation models for adaptive fractionated magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy of the abdomen.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for treatment delivery: image-guided radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Review
- Improving Radiotherapy Plan Quality for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Enhanced UNet Dose Prediction.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating deep learning auto-contouring for lung radiation therapy: A review of accuracy, variability, efficiency and dose, in target volumes and organs at risk.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- The role of online MR-guided multi-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in lung tumours.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Automatic lung segmentation of magnetic resonance images: A new approach applied to healthy volunteers undergoing enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold for motion-mitigated 4D proton therapy of lung tumors.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- DART-Net: A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Precise Radiotherapy Planning with Automated Multiorgan Segmentation and RTSTRUCT Generation.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeMagnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) offers treatment plan adaptation to the anatomy of the day. In the current MRgRT workflow, this requires the time consuming and repetitive task of manual delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs), which is also prone to inter- and intra-observer variability. Therefore, deep learning autosegmentation (DLAS) is becoming increasingly attractive. No investigation of its application to OARs in thoracic magnetic resonance images (MRIs) from MRgRT has been done so far. This study aimed to fill this gap. MATERIALS AND
methods122 planning MRIs from patients treated at a 0.35 T MR-Linac were retrospectively collected. Using an 80/19/23 (training/validation/test) split, individual 3D U-Nets for segmentation of the left lung, right lung, heart, aorta, spinal canal and esophagus were trained. These were compared to the clinically used contours based on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). They were also graded on their clinical usability by a radiation oncologist.
resultsMedian DSC was 0.96, 0.96, 0.94, 0.90, 0.88 and 0.78 for left lung, right lung, heart, aorta, spinal canal and esophagus, respectively. Median 95th percentile values of the HD were 3.9, 5.3, 5.8, 3.0, 2.6 and 3.5 mm, respectively. The physician preferred the network generated contours over the clinical contours, deeming 85 out of 129 to not require any correction, 25 immediately usable for treatment planning, 15 requiring minor and 4 requiring major corrections.
conclusionsWe trained 3D U-Nets on clinical MRI planning data which produced accurate delineations in the thoracic region. DLAS contours were preferred over the clinical contours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.