Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37574549›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Deep learning based automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk for 0.35 T MRgRT of lung tumors.

Marvin F Ribeiro, Sebastian Marschner, Maria Kawula, Moritz Rabe, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Marco Riboldi, Guillaume Landry, Christopher Kurz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence for treatment delivery: image-guided radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marvin F RibeiroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian MarschnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maria KawulaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Moritz RabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marco RiboldiDepartment of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Guillaume LandryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christopher KurzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. christopher.kurz@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung 2019.162.1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMagnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) offers treatment plan adaptation to the anatomy of the day. In the current MRgRT workflow, this requires the time consuming and repetitive task of manual delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs), which is also prone to inter- and intra-observer variability. Therefore, deep learning autosegmentation (DLAS) is becoming increasingly attractive. No investigation of its application to OARs in thoracic magnetic resonance images (MRIs) from MRgRT has been done so far. This study aimed to fill this gap. MATERIALS AND

methods122 planning MRIs from patients treated at a 0.35 T MR-Linac were retrospectively collected. Using an 80/19/23 (training/validation/test) split, individual 3D U-Nets for segmentation of the left lung, right lung, heart, aorta, spinal canal and esophagus were trained. These were compared to the clinically used contours based on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). They were also graded on their clinical usability by a radiation oncologist.

resultsMedian DSC was 0.96, 0.96, 0.94, 0.90, 0.88 and 0.78 for left lung, right lung, heart, aorta, spinal canal and esophagus, respectively. Median 95th percentile values of the HD were 3.9, 5.3, 5.8, 3.0, 2.6 and 3.5 mm, respectively. The physician preferred the network generated contours over the clinical contours, deeming 85 out of 129 to not require any correction, 25 immediately usable for treatment planning, 15 requiring minor and 4 requiring major corrections.

conclusionsWe trained 3D U-Nets on clinical MRI planning data which produced accurate delineations in the thoracic region. DLAS contours were preferred over the clinical contours.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAuto-segmentationDeep learningMRI-guidanceMR-LinacThorax

Identifiers

PMID37574549
PMCPMC10424424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.