Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37574545›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Testing pathways to scale: study protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial of a centralized and a decentralized ("Train the Trainers") dissemination of a mental health program for Kenyan adolescents.

Brenda Ochuku, Tom L Osborn, Daisy Nerima, Afra van der Markt, Thomas Rusch, Herman Omune, Solace Akello, David M Ndetei, Katherine E Venturo-Conerly

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brenda OchukuShamiri Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tom L OsbornShamiri Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daisy NerimaShamiri Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Afra van der MarktShamiri Institute, Nairobi, Kenya. avandermarkt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-9438
Thomas RuschCompetence Center for Empirical Research Methods, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.
Herman OmuneShamiri Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Solace AkelloShamiri Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
David M NdeteiAfrican Mental Health Research & Training Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya.
Katherine E Venturo-ConerlyShamiri Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Fonds d'Innovation pour le Développement (FID) 971_301121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding care in Kenya to all youth in need is difficult because of a shortage of professional providers and societal stigma. Previous trials of the Anansi model, which involves delivering low-touch mental health interventions through a tiered caregiving model (including lay-providers, supervisors, and clinical experts), have shown its effectiveness for reducing depression and anxiety symptoms in school-going Kenyan adolescents. In this trial, we aim to assess two different scale-up strategies by comparing centralized implementation (i.e., by the organization that designed the Anansi model) against implementation through an implementing partner.

methodsIn this three-arm trial, 1600 adolescents aged 13 to 20 years will be randomized to receive the Shamiri intervention from either the Shamiri Institute or an implementation partner or to be placed in the treatment as usual (TAU) control group. The implementation partner will be trained and supplied with protocols to ensure that the same procedures are followed by both implementors. Implementation activities will run concurrently for both implementors. The Shamiri intervention will be delivered by trained lay providers to groups of 10-15 adolescents over four weekly sessions which will take place in secondary schools in Machakos and Makueni counties in Kenya. The TAU group will receive the usual care offered by their respective schools. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, midpoint (2 weeks), endpoint (4 weeks), and 1 month follow-up. The analysis will be based on an intent-to-treat approach. Mixed effects models will be used to assess trajectories over time of the primary outcomes (anxiety and depressive symptoms, mental well-being, perceived social support, and academic performance) and secondary outcomes for the intervention groups and the control group. Effect sizes will be computed for the mean differences of the intervention and control arms at midpoint, endpoint, and follow-up. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide insight into the comparative effectiveness of different strategies for scaling a school-based mental health care model. Findings will also indicate areas for improved efficiency of the model to enhance its replicability by other implementors.

trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) (ID: PACTR202305589854478, Approved: 02/05/2023).

Indexed as

AnxietyMental HealthAdolescentAnxiety DisordersHumansKenyaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAdolescentsAnxietyCharacter strengths interventionDepressionGlobal Mental HealthMental healthPsychotherapyShamiri Intervention

Identifiers

PMID37574545
PMCPMC10424401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.