ArticleJournal of natural medicines2023
Simplified detection of the species of origin of antler velvets using single-stranded tag hybridization chromatographic printed-array strip.
Article in Journal of natural medicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we developed a convenient and easy-to-use origin identification method for antler velvets based on a simple DNA extraction technique and single-stranded tag hybridization chromatographic printed-array strip (STH-PAS). The primer sets used to detect Cervus elaphus, Rangifer tarandus, and 12S rRNA did not engage in non-specific reactions such as primer dimer formation. In both the triplex and singleplex assays, the sensitivity was < 1 ng DNA. Moreover, Cervus elaphus DNA could be detected in OTC crude drug products. Although the detection sensitivity resulting from the simplified extraction was slightly lower than that obtained with extraction by conventional methods, the amount of DNA was sufficient even from a small sample. The choice of a triplex or singleplex assay will depend on the purpose of the test. For example, if it is important to determine whether the antler velvet is derived from Cervus elaphus or Rangifer tarandus, a triplex assay is appropriate. If it is necessary to explore whether antler velvet from Cervus elaphus is included in an OTC crude drug product, a singleplex assay using the Cervus elaphus primer set is informative. If it is necessary to explore whether powdered antler velvet includes counterfeit products (from Rangifer tarandus), a singleplex assay employing the Rangifer tarandus primer is appropriate. The singleplex assay detects minor components even at a 1,000:1 ratio. Our study thus demonstrated the utility of a method combining simple DNA extraction with STH-PAS for efficient identification of the origin of antler velvets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.