Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37573993›Full record

Trial reportThe Annals of thoracic surgery2023

Paravertebral vs Epidural Anesthesia for Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

Zixiang Wu, Qi Wang, Cong Wu, Chuanqiang Wu, Huan Yu, Congcong Chen, Hong He, Ming Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zixiang WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Cong WuDepartment of Medical Quality Management, the Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Chuanqiang WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Huan YuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Congcong ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hong HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ming WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. Electronic address: iwuming22@zju.edu.cn.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe choice of postoperative pain management for patients who experience moderate to severe acute pain after thoracoscopic surgery is debatable. This study aimed to determine whether paravertebral block (PVB) provides more benefits than thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for thoracoscopic surgery.

methodsFrom February 2020 to April 2022, patients without chronic pain who were scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to the PVB group or the TEA group. The visual analogue scale score was used to measure the degree of pain when the patients were at rest or coughing.

resultsIn total, 176 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. No significant difference in the visual analogue scale score was found between the 2 groups at rest (P = .395) or with coughing (P = .157). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the average pain score between these 2 states (P = .221). The median time for catheter placement in the PVB group was 5 minutes, which was shorter than that (14 minutes) in the TEA group (P < .001). Moreover, the catheter placement failure rate in the PVB group was lower than that in the TEA group (P = .038). The incidence of hypotension (P = .016) and urinary retention (P = .006) in the PVB group was lower than that in the TEA group.

conclusionsPVB can provide pain relief that is similar to that of TEA but with no additional puncture pain, a shorter catheter placement time, and fewer side effects in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, EpiduralPostoperative PainThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID37573993
OpenAlexW4385777718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.