Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37573885›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2024

Agreement of Antipsychotic Use between Nursing Home Electronic Records and Minimum Data Set.

Tingting Zhang, Ellen McCreedy, Laura Dionne, Ryan Conard, Vincent Mor

Abstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tingting ZhangCenter for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: tingting_zhang@brown.edu.
Ellen McCreedyCenter for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Laura DionneCenter for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Ryan ConardBrown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Vincent MorCenter for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Providence Veterans Administration Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

METRIcAL - Music & MEmory: a Pragmatic TRIal for Nursing Home Residents with ALzheimer's DiseaseR33AG057451 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MOR, VINCENT · 2018 to 2021
$5.0M
NIA NIH HHS R33 AG057451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNursing home (NH) Minimum Data Set (MDS) have frequently been used to measure medication use in epidemiologic studies, but there is little evidence on the accuracy of MDS-based medication records. We compared antipsychotic use estimated using 2 data sources-MDS and NH electronic medication administration records (eMAR).

designCross-sectional comparison. SETTING AND

participantsThis analysis was based on MDS and linked eMAR data of 604 NH residents with dementia at 54 NHs in 10 states, participating in a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial (METRIcAL), from June 2019 to February 2020.

methodsOne admission, quarterly, or annual MDS assessment was chosen for each participant. The MDS assessment recorded the number of antipsychotic treatment days during a 7-day window. We then identified antipsychotic administrations during the corresponding window in the eMAR. We used Cohen kappa to assess agreement in the proportion of participants on antipsychotics during the week and used intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the agreement of treatment days. We further used the eMAR data as a reference to calculate validity parameters.

resultsA total of 29.5% of study participants were identified as antipsychotic users based on the MDS vs 28.3% based on the eMAR data (kappa value: 0.96). MDS-based average treatment duration was estimated to be 2.0, consistent with eMAR-based estimate (1.8 days, ICC: 0.96). The sensitivity was 98.8% (95% CI 95.8%-99.9%), the specificity was 97.9% (95% CI 96.1%-99.1%), the positive predictive value was 94.9% (95% CI 90.8%-97.3%), and the negative predictive value was 99.5% (95% CI 98.2%-99.9%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Agreement between the MDS and eMAR in antipsychotic use is high, suggesting that the MDS is a valid tool to measure antipsychotic use in epidemiologic studies. Further studies with large and diverse populations are warranted to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalizationHumansNursing HomesSkilled Nursing FacilitiesAntipsychotic Agentsantipsychoticselectronic health recordsminimum data setNursing home

Identifiers

PMID37573885
PMCPMC10858287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.