Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37573450›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) measurement might be useful as an early diagnostic biomarker and screening test for gastric cancer.

Lidy Vannessa Mejía-Guarnizo, Paula Stefanny Monroy-Camacho, Daniel Esteban Rincón-Rodríguez, Andrés Rincón-Riveros, Daniel Augusto Martinez-Vargas, Carlos Alexander Huertas-Caro, Ricardo Oliveros-Wilches, Ricardo Sanchez-Pedraza, Marcela Nuñez-Lemus, Carlos Felipe Cristancho-Lievano and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Circulating Proteins as Diagnostic Markers in Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lidy Vannessa Mejía-Guarnizo *Cancer Biology Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Paula Stefanny Monroy-Camacho *Cancer Biology Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Daniel Esteban Rincón-RodríguezCancer Biology Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés Rincón-RiverosResearch Group REMA, Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca, Bogotá, Colombia.
Daniel Augusto Martinez-VargasCancer Biology Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Carlos Alexander Huertas-CaroCancer Biology Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ricardo Oliveros-WilchesGastroenterology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ricardo Sanchez-PedrazaResearch Support and Monitoring Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Marcela Nuñez-LemusResearch Support and Monitoring Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Carlos Felipe Cristancho-LievanoResearch Support and Monitoring Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Adriana Milena Castellanos-MorenoCancer Biology Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Lina María Martinez-CorreaCancer Biology Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Josefa Antonia Rodríguez-GarcíaCancer Biology Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia. jrodriguez@cancer.gov.co.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · COUniversidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most frequent malignancy worldwide and has a high mortality rate related to late diagnosis. Although the gold standard for the GC diagnosis is endoscopy with biopsy, nonetheless, it is not cost-effective and is invasive for the patient. The Human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) molecule is a checkpoint of the immune response. Its overexpression in cancer is associated with immune evasion, metastasis, poor prognosis, and lower overall survival. We evaluate the plasma levels of soluble HLA-G, (sHLA-G) in patients with GC and benign gastric pathologies using an ELISA test. A higher concentration of sHLA-G in patients with GC than in those with benign pathologies, higher levels of plasma sHLA-G in women with GC compared with men and significant differences in the sHLA-G levels between the benign gastric pathologies evaluated, was our main findings. As no significant differences were found between the GC assessed stages in our study population, we suggest that sHLA-G is not an adequate marker for staging GC, but it does have diagnostic potential. In addition to providing information on the potential of sHLA-G as a diagnostic marker for GC, our study demonstrate that HLA-G molecules can be found in the membrane of exosomes, which highlights the need to perform studies with a larger number of samples to explore the functional implications of HLA-G positive exosomes in the context of gastric cancer, and to determine the clinical significance and possible applications of these findings in the development of non-invasive diagnostic methods.

Indexed as

HLA-G AntigensStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkersEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingBiomarkersHLA-G Antigens

Identifiers

PMID37573450
PMCPMC10423220
OpenAlexW4385783301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.