ReviewOncogene2023
Commonalities and differences in the mutational signature and somatic driver mutation landscape across solid and hollow viscus organs.
Review in Oncogene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive analysis of mutational signatures and corresponding driver genes in cervical cancer from Xinjiang.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Nonhypermutator Cancers Access Driver Mutations Through Reversals in Germline Mutational Bias.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- STAG2 mutations in the normal colon induce upregulation of oncogenic pathways in neighbouring wildtype cells.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in sequencing have revealed a highly variegated landscape of mutational signatures and somatic driver mutations in a range of normal tissues. Normal tissues accumulate mutations at varying rates ranging from 11 per cell per year in the liver, to 1879 per cell per year in the bladder. In addition, some normal tissues are also comprised of a large proportion of cells which possess driver mutations while appearing phenotypically normal, as in the oesophagus where a majority of cells harbour driver mutations. Individual tissue proliferation and mutation rate, unique mutagenic stimuli, and local tissue architecture contribute to this highly variegated landscape which confounds the functional characterization of driver mutations found in normal tissue. In particular, our understanding of the relationship between normal tissue somatic mutations and tumour initiation or future cancer risk remains poor. Here, we describe the mutational signatures and somatic driver mutations in solid and hollow viscus organs, highlighting unique characteristics in a tissue-specific manner, while simultaneously seeking to describe commonalities which can bring forward a basic unified theory on the role of these driver mutations in tumour initiation. We discuss novel findings which can be used to inform future research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.