Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37573388›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Perceptions of chief clinical information officers on the state of electronic health records systems interoperability in NHS England: a qualitative interview study.

Edmond Li, Olivia Lounsbury, Jonathan Clarke, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi, Ana Luisa Neves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. eHealth implementationFrontiers in digital health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Edmond LiInstitute of Global Health Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK. Edmond.li19@imperial.ac.uk.
Olivia LounsburyJohns Hopkins Children's Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jonathan ClarkeInstitute of Global Health Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hutan AshrafianInstitute of Global Health Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ara DarziInstitute of Global Health Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ana Luisa NevesInstitute of Global Health Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the era of electronic health records (EHR), the ability to share clinical data is a key facilitator of healthcare delivery. Since the introduction of EHRs, this aspect has been extensively studied from the perspective of healthcare providers. Less often explored are the day-to-day challenges surrounding the procurement, deployment, maintenance, and use of interoperable EHR systems, from the perspective of healthcare administrators, such as chief clinical information officers (CCIOs).

objectiveOur study aims to capture the perceptions of CCIOs on the current state of EHR interoperability in the NHS, its impact on patient safety, the perceived facilitators and barriers to improving EHR interoperability, and what the future of EHR development in the NHS may entail.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted between November 2020 - October 2021. Convenience sampling was employed to recruit NHS England CCIOs. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed by two independent researchers to identify emerging themes.

resultsFifteen CCIOs participated in the study. Participants reported that limited EHR interoperability contributed to the inability to easily access and transfer data into a unified source, thus resulting in data fragmentation. The resulting lack of clarity on patients' health status negatively impacts patient safety through suboptimal care coordination, duplication of efforts, and more defensive practice. Facilitators to improving interoperability included the recognition of the need by clinicians, patient expectations, and the inherent centralised nature of the NHS. Barriers included systems usability difficulties, and institutional, data management, and financial-related challenges. Looking ahead, participants acknowledged that realising that vision across the NHS would require a renewed focus on mandating data standards, user-centred design, greater patient involvement, and encouraging inter-organisational collaboration.

conclusionTackling poor interoperability will require solutions both at the technical level and in the wider policy context. This will involve demanding interoperability functionalities from the outset in procurement contracts, fostering greater inter-organisation cooperation on implementation strategies, and encouraging systems vendors to prioritise interoperability in their products. Only by comprehensively addressing these challenges would the full potential promised by the use of fully interoperable EHRs be realised.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsState MedicineDelivery of Health CareEnglandHumansQualitative ResearchElectronic health recordsHealth ITHealth policyInteroperabilityPatient safetyQualitative researchSemi-structured interviews

Identifiers

PMID37573388
PMCPMC10423420
OpenAlexW4385779995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.