Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37573384›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2023

Comparison of two inspiratory muscle training protocols in people with spinal cord injury: a secondary analysis.

Anne E Palermo, Jane E Butler, Claire L Boswell-Ruys

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06547606 (The Effect of Resistive Inspiratory Muscle Training on Optimizing Lung Function in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06547606 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Resistive Inspiratory Muscle Training on Optimizing Lung Function in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of DhakaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsSpinal Cord Injury (SCI), Respiratory ComplicationArmsUsual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne E PalermoNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4642-2594
Jane E ButlerNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5834-8152
Claire L Boswell-RuysNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. c.boswell-ruys@neura.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4922-5262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN/

settingSecondary analysis.

objectivesTo compare the change in maximal inspiratory pressure (PI

methodsData originated from two published studies. Participants completed flow-resistive IMT (F-IMT) at 80% daily PI

resultsOver 4 weeks, there was no difference in the change in PI

conclusionsOur findings support both methods of IMT as the change in PI

Indexed as

Respiratory MusclesSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRespiratory Therapy

Identifiers

PMID37573384
PMCPMC10423237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.