Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37573362›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2023

Phenotypic, molecular detection and antibiogram analysis of Aeromonas Hydrophila from Oreochromis Niloticus (Nile Tilapia) and Ready-To- eat fish products in selected Rift Valley lakes of Ethiopia.

Nebiyu Kassa Kerigano, Tesfaye Rufael Chibsa, Yitbarek Getachew Molla, Abde Aliy Mohammed, Mekdes Tamiru, Abebe Olani Bulto, Tafesse Koran Wodaj, Dereje Shegu Gebreweld, Alemu Kebede Abdi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cross-sectional analysis of risk factors associated withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nebiyu Kassa KeriganoDepartment of Fish Disease Research and Diagnostics, Animal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia. neby.etu@gmail.com.
Tesfaye Rufael ChibsaAnimal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Yitbarek Getachew MollaCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture Department of Clinical Studies, Addis Ababa University, Debrezeit, Ethiopia.
Abde Aliy MohammedDepartment of Molecular Biology, Animal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Mekdes TamiruDepartment of General Bacteriology, Animal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Abebe Olani BultoDepartment of General Bacteriology, Animal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Tafesse Koran WodajDepartment of General Bacteriology, Animal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Dereje Shegu GebreweldDepartment of General Bacteriology, Animal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Alemu Kebede AbdiDepartment of Fish Disease Research and Diagnostics, Animal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Ethiopian Public Health Institute · ETAddis Ababa University · ETAnimal Health Research Institute · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAeromonas hydrophila is a zoonotic bacterial pathogen that frequently causes disease and mass mortalities among cultured and feral fishes worldwide. In Ethiopia, A. hydrophila outbreak was reported in Sebeta fish ponds and in Lake Tana fishery. However, there is no to little information on the molecular, and phenotypical characteristics of A. hydrophila in Ethiopian fisheries. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2020 to May 2021 in selected Ethiopian Rift valley lakes.

resultsA total of 140 samples were collected aseptically from fish (Muscle, Gill, Intestine, Spleen and Kidney) from fish landing sites, market and restaurants with purposive sampling methods. Aeromonas selective media (AMB), morphological and biochemical tests were used to isolate and identify A. hydrophila. Accordingly, the pathogen was isolated from 81 (60.45%) of samples. Among the isolates 92.59% expressed virulence trait through β hemolysis on blood agar media with 5% sheep blood. Moreover, 54 strains (66.67%) were further confirmed with Real-Time PCR (qPCR) using ahaI gene specific primers and optimized protocol. The highest (68.51%) were detected from live fish, (24.07%) were from market fish and the lowest (7.4%%) were from ready-to-eat products. Antibiogram analysis was conducted on ten representative isolates. Accordingly, A. hydrophila isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin (100%), chloramphenicol (100%) and ceftriaxone (100%). However, all ten isolates were resistant to Amoxicillin and Penicillin.

conclusionsThe study indicates A. hydrophila strains carrying virulence ahaI gene that were ß-hemolytic and resistant to antibiotics commonly used in human and veterinary medicine are circulating in the fishery. The detection of the pathogen in 140 of the sampled fish population is alarming for potential outbreaks and zoonosis. Therefore, further molecular epidemiology of the disease should be studied to establish potential inter host transmission and antibiotic resistance traits. Therefore, raising the public awareness on risk associated with consuming undercooked or raw fish meat is pertinent.

Indexed as

CichlidsFish DiseasesGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsSheep DiseasesAeromonasAeromonas hydrophilaAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFish ProductsHumansLakesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSheepA. hydrophilaEthiopiaNile tilapiaqPCRRift valley lake

Identifiers

PMID37573362
PMCPMC10422702
OpenAlexW4385783509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.