ArticleAdvances in therapy2023
Key Device Attributes for Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligand Therapy in Acromegaly and Neuroendocrine Tumours.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeople living with acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) may be treated with injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), administered by either a caregiver or as self-injection via a proprietary or generic device. Injection device attributes that contribute to ease of use and storage, minimise preparation requirements, and reduce injection pain are associated with improved adherence and more favourable therapeutic outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess current opinion surrounding favourable SRL device attributes for people living with acromegaly and NETs as well as that of their caregivers.
methodsParticipants (healthcare professionals [HCPs] and patients/non-HCP caregivers) from 11 countries were invited to answer survey questions related to their demographic, experience, and preferences as they relate to the real-world use of injectable SRL devices. Questions were developed based on review of available literature and meetings with a Scientific Committee.
resultsDevice attributes preferred by the patient/non-HCP caregiver group (n = 211) included confidence that the correct drug amount is delivered (76%), quick administration with minimal pain/discomfort (68%), and device safety (needle-safety and low risk of contamination; 53%). Device attributes preferred by HCPs (n = 52) were quick administration with minimal pain/discomfort (69%), correct use is easy to learn, confidence in handling the device (63%), and confidence that the correct drug amount is delivered (62%).
conclusionThe results identified key features of injection devices for SRL therapy which merit consideration for optimal management and underscore the importance of patient partnership in treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.