Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37572790›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2023

What Can Ribo-Seq, Immunopeptidomics, and Proteomics Tell Us About the Noncanonical Proteome?

John R Prensner, Jennifer G Abelin, Leron W Kok, Karl R Clauser, Jonathan M Mudge, Jorge Ruiz-Orera, Michal Bassani-Sternberg, Robert L Moritz, Eric W Deutsch, Sebastiaan van Heesch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sketching microprotein portraits.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

John R PrensnerDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Electronic address: prensner@umich.edu.
Jennifer G AbelinBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Leron W KokPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karl R ClauserBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jonathan M MudgeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Jorge Ruiz-OreraCardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Michal Bassani-SternbergLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Agora Center Bugnon 25A, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Agora Cancer Research Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Robert L MoritzInstitute for Systems Biology (ISB), Seattle, Washington, USA.
Eric W DeutschInstitute for Systems Biology (ISB), Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sebastiaan van HeeschPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Broad Institute · USInstitute for Systems Biology · USPrincess Máxima Center · NLEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBMax Delbrück Center · DEUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Systems BiologyU19AG023122 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI NICHOLAS Joseph SCHORK · 2004 to 2026
$102.6M
GENCODE Resource ProjectU41HG007234 · NHGRI · SANGER INSTITUTE · PI FLICEK, PAUL · 2013 to 2020
$20.3M
ProteomicsP01CA206978 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI WU, CATHERINE JU-YING · 2016 to 2025
$17.0M
GENCODE: comprehensive reference genome annotation for human and mouseU24HG007234 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI Fergal James Martin · 2021 to 2026
$16.1M
Shortening the development cycle time of Trans Proteomic Pipeline tools with high performance computingR01GM087221 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DEUTSCH, ERIC, MORITZ, ROBERT L · 2010 to 2021
$6.0M
Center of Excellence for High Throughput Proteogenomic CharacterizationU24CA270823 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI STEVEN A CARR, MICHAEL A GILLETTE · 2022 to 2026
$5.3M
Proteogenomic Predictors of Recurrence in Non-small Cell Lung CancerU01CA271402 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN A CARR, MICHAEL A GILLETTE · 2022 to 2026
$5.0M
Center for comprehensive proteogenomic data analysisU24CA271075 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI GAD A GETZ, Denkanikota R Mani · 2022 to 2026
$3.9M
Deciphering non-canonical translation in high risk medulloblastomaK08CA263552 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI John Prensner · 2022 to 2026
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA263552NCI NIH HHS P01 CA206978NCI NIH HHS U01 CA271402NCI NIH HHS U24 CA270823NCI NIH HHS U24 CA271075NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG007234NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007234NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087221Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 108749/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ribosome profiling (Ribo-Seq) has proven transformative for our understanding of the human genome and proteome by illuminating thousands of noncanonical sites of ribosome translation outside the currently annotated coding sequences (CDSs). A conservative estimate suggests that at least 7000 noncanonical ORFs are translated, which, at first glance, has the potential to expand the number of human protein CDSs by 30%, from ∼19,500 annotated CDSs to over 26,000 annotated CDSs. Yet, additional scrutiny of these ORFs has raised numerous questions about what fraction of them truly produce a protein product and what fraction of those can be understood as proteins according to conventional understanding of the term. Adding further complication is the fact that published estimates of noncanonical ORFs vary widely by around 30-fold, from several thousand to several hundred thousand. The summation of this research has left the genomics and proteomics communities both excited by the prospect of new coding regions in the human genome but searching for guidance on how to proceed. Here, we discuss the current state of noncanonical ORF research, databases, and interpretation, focusing on how to assess whether a given ORF can be said to be "protein coding."

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisProteomeHumansOpen Reading FramesProteomicsRibosome ProfilingRibosomesProteomeimmunopeptidomicsmass spectrometrymicroproteinnoncanonical ORFRibo-Seq

Identifiers

PMID37572790
PMCPMC10506109
OpenAlexW4385728580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.