Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37572556›Full record

ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2023

(VISIION-S): Viz.ai Implementation of Stroke augmented Intelligence and communications platform to improve Indicators and Outcomes for a comprehensive stroke center and Network - Sustainability.

Kim Van Orden, Dawn Matherne Meyer, Emily S Perrinez, Dolores Torres, Briana Poynor, Ben Alwood, Julie Bykowski, Alex Khalessi, Brett C Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kim Van OrdenDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: kvanordenmd@gmail.com.
Dawn Matherne MeyerDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: dmmeyer@health.ucsd.edu.
Emily S PerrinezDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: esperrinez@health.ucsd.edu.
Dolores TorresDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: dolores.torres2018@gmail.com.
Briana PoynorDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: briana.moore.md@gmail.com.
Ben AlwoodDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: benalwood@gmail.com.
Julie BykowskiDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: jbykowski@health.ucsd.edu.
Alex KhalessiDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: akhalessi@health.ucsd.edu.
Brett C MeyerDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: bcmeyer@health.ucsd.edu.

Funding

San Diego StrokeNet Regional Coordinating CenterU24NS107225 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BRETT C MEYER · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS107225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs) strive to improve neuro-intervention (NIR) times, process improvements are put in place to streamline workflows. Our prior publication (VISIION) demonstrated improvements in key performance indicators (KPIs). The purpose VISIION-S was to analyze whether those results were sustainable. MATERIALS AND

methodsConsecutive Direct Arriving LVO (DALVO) and telemedicine transfer LVO (BEMI) stroke NIR cases were assessed, including subgroups of DALVO-OnHours, DALVO-OffHours, BEMI-OnHours, and BEMI-OffHours. We analyzed times for the original 6 months pre (6/10/20-1/15/21) and compared them to a 17 month post-implementation period (1/16/21- 6/25/22) to evaluate for sustainability. Mann-Whitney U was utilized.

results150 NIR cases were analyzed pre (n = 47) v. post (n = 103) implementation (DALVO-OnHours 7 v. 20, DALVO-OffHours 10 v. 25, BEMI-OnHours 13 v. 20, BEMI-OffHours 17 v. 38). For Door-to-groin (DTG), improvement was noted for DALVO-OffHours 39%(157 min,96 min;p < 0.001), DALVO-ALL 25%(127 min,95 min;p = 0.006), BEMI-OffHours 46%(45 min,25 min;p = 0.023), and BEMI-ALL 40%(42 min,25 min;p = 0.005). Activation-to-groin (ATG), door-to-device (DTD), and door-to-recanalization (DTR) also showed statistical improvements. For DALVO-OffHours, there were reductions in door to CT (DTC) 80%(26 min,5 min;p < 0.001), ATG 32%(90 min,61 min;p = 0.036), DTG 39%(157 min,96 min;p < 0.001), DTD 31%(178 min,123 min;p = 0.002), and DTR 32%(197 min,135 min;p = 0.003).

conclusionsWe noted sustainability over a 17 month period with sustained reduction in KPIs for even more NIR time interval comparisons. In the greatest opportunity subgroup (DALVO-OffHours), we noted a reduction in all 5 time interval metrics. Our sustainability finding is important to show that process improvements continued even after the immediate period, adding credibility to the results. Models such as this could be useful for other centers striving to optimize workflow and improve times.

Indexed as

StrokeHumansTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentCSCCTMismatchNeuroInterventionPerfusionSustainability

Identifiers

PMID37572556
PMCPMC13475333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.