ArticleJournal of plant research2023
Mycorrhizal specificity differences in epiphytic habitat: three epiphytic orchids harbor distinct ecological and physiological specificity.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in orchid mycorrhizal diversity between terrestrial and epiphytic habitats on Yakushima Island, Japan.Journal of plant research · 2026Article
- Mycorrhizal specialization for Tulasnellaceae fungi in Taeniophyllum marianense, a leafless epiphytic orchid native to Guam.Journal of plant research · 2026Article
- Review
- Taxonomic study ofMycoscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Orchidaceae has diversified in tree canopies and accounts for 68% of vascular epiphytes. Differences in mycorrhizal communities among epiphytic orchids can reduce species competition for mycorrhizal fungi and contribute to niche partitioning, which may be a crucial driver of the unusual species diversification among orchids. Mycorrhizal specificity-the range of fungi allowing mycorrhizal partnerships-was evaluated by assessment of mycorrhizal communities in the field (ecological specificity) and symbiotic cultures in the laboratory (physiological specificity) for three epiphytic orchids inhabiting Japan. Mycorrhizal communities were assessed with co-existing individuals growing within 10 cm of each other, revealing that ecological specificity varied widely among the three species, ranging from dominance by a single Ceratobasidiaceae fungus to diverse mycobionts across the Ceratobasidiaceae and Tulasnellaceae. In vitro seed germination tests revealed clear differences in physiological specificity among the three orchids, and that the primary mycorrhizal partners contributed to seed germination. In vitro compatibility ranges of three orchids strongly reflect the mycorrhizal community composition of wild populations. This suggests that differences in in situ mycorrhizal communities are not strongly driven by environmental factors, but are primarily due to physiological differences among orchid species. This study shows that the symbiotic strategy among the epiphytic orchid species varies from specialized to generalized association, which may contribute to biotic niche partitioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.