Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37572237›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2023

Internal jugular vein collapsibility does not predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients after cardiac surgery.

Jan Horejsek, Martin Balík, Jan Kunstýř, Pavel Michálek, Petr Kopecký, Tomáš Brožek, Tereza Bartošová, Adam Fink, Petr Waldauf, Michal Porizka

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jan HorejsekDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4435-9694
Martin BalíkDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1864-2143
Jan KunstýřDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3659-7764
Pavel MichálekDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8119-5927
Petr KopeckýDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.
Tomáš BrožekDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.
Tereza BartošováDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic.
Adam FinkFirst Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czechia.
Petr WaldaufDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady in Prague, Prague, 10034, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0003-4668-5837
Michal PorizkaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic. michal.porizka@vfn.cz.ORCID 0000-0003-0314-7465

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky MZCZ-DRO-VFN64165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of internal jugular vein (IJV) collapsibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients after cardiac surgery.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, spontaneously breathing patients were enrolled on the first postoperative day after coronary artery bypass grafting. Hemodynamic data coupled with simultaneous ultrasound assessment of the IJV were collected at baseline and after passive leg raising test (PLR). Continuous cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), and stroke volume variation (SVV) were assessed with FloTrac

resultsFifty-four patients were included in the study. Seventeen (31.5%) were fluid responders. The responders demonstrated significantly lower inspiratory and expiratory diameters of the IJV at baseline, but IJV collapsibility was comparable (P = 0.7). Using the cut-off point of 20%, IJV collapsibility predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 38.9%, ROC AUC 0.55.

conclusionIn spontaneously breathing patients after surgical coronary revascularisation, collapsibility of the internal jugular vein did not predict fluid responsiveness.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresJugular VeinsFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansRespirationStroke VolumeFluid responsivenessHypovolemiaJugular vein collapsibilityJugular vein distensibilityPulse contour analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.