Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37572198›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2023

Chapter 2:indications and dosing of anticancer drug therapy in patients with impaired kidney function, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022.

Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Takamitsu Inoue, Yuichi Koizumi, Yusuke Kobayashi, Hiroshi Kitamura, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Takashi Takeda, Takehito Yamamoto, Ryohei Yamamoto, Takeshi Matsubara and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. nishiuro@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.
Takamitsu InoueDepartment of Renal and Urological Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yuichi KoizumiDepartment of Pharmacy, Seichokai Fuchu Hospital, Izumi, Japan.
Yusuke KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Kazuhiro YamamotoDepartment of Pharmacy, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Takashi TakedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehito YamamotoDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryohei YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Takeshi MatsubaraDepartment of Nephrology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-1551
Junichi HoshinoDepartment of Nephrology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoko YanagitaDepartment of Nephrology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
committee of Clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney disease during anticancer drug therapy 2022
Keio University · JPKyoto University · JPAkita University · JPFuchu Hospital · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPKobe University Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JPUniversity of Toyama · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This comprehensive review discusses the dosing strategies of cancer treatment drugs for patients with impaired kidney function, specifically those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), undergoing hemodialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. CKD patients often necessitate dose adjustments of chemotherapeutic agents, e.g., platinum preparations, pyrimidine fluoride antimetabolites, antifolate agents, molecularly targeted agents, and bone-modifying agents, to prevent drug accumulation and toxicity due to diminished renal clearance of the administered drugs and their metabolites. In hemodialysis patients, factors such as drug removal from hemodialysis and altered pharmacokinetics demand careful optimization of anticancer drug therapy, including dose adjustment and timing of administration. While free cisplatin is removed by hemodialysis, most of the tissue- and protein-bound cisplatin remains in the body and rebound cisplatin elevations are observed after hemodialysis. It is not recommended hemodialysis for drug removal, regardless of timing. Kidney transplant patients encounter unique challenges in cancer treatment, as maintaining the balance between reduction of immunosuppression, switching to mTOR inhibitors, and considering potential drug interactions with chemotherapeutic agents and immunosuppressants are crucial for preventing graft rejection and achieving optimal oncologic outcomes. The review underscores the importance of personalized, patient-centric approaches to anticancer drug therapy in patients with impaired kidney function.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicCisplatinHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyPractice Guidelines as TopicRenal DialysisAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinImmunosuppressive AgentsAnticancer drug therapyChronic kidney diseaseHemodialysisKidney transplant

Identifiers

PMID37572198
OpenAlexW4385782454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.