ArticleNeurochemical research2023
The m
Article in Neurochemical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interaction between N6-methyladenosine (mGenes & diseases · 2026Review
- N 6 -methyladenosine modification regulates cell death in cognitive impairment.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Mechanisms in Perioperative Medicine: From Neuroinflammation and NETosis to Organ Dysfunction and Precision Therapeutics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Exerkine-Mediated Regulation of the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Neuroprotection: Mechanistic Insights and the Role of Exercise.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- The NLRP3 Inflammasome: A Central Mediator in Sevoflurane-Induced Neurotoxicity and A Potential Target for Neuroprotection.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Pyroptosis Regulated by N6-Methyladenosine Modification: Implications for Pyroptosis-Related Disease Therapy.Journal of innate immunity · 2026Review
- Review
- m6A methylation: a new frontier in epilepsy research and therapeutics.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sevoflurane is one of the most widely used anesthetics in surgery which is the main cause of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Previous reports confirmed that YTHDF1 is differently expressed in sevoflurane-induced POCD, while the roles and mechanistic details remain unclear. The molecular expressions were assessed using qRT-PCR, western blot, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry. Pathological change in the hippocampus tissues was analyzed using HE staining. Cognitive ability in rats was measured using MWM test. Hippocampal neuronal viability and apoptosis were measured by MTT assay and flow cytometry, respectively. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines were assessed using ELISA. The interaction between YTHDF1 and CREB was analyzed by RNA immunoprecipitation assay. YTHDF1 was significantly decreased in hippocampus tissues by sevoflurane exposure, and its overexpression could improve sevoflurane-induced neuron damage and cognitive dysfunction. Meanwhile, YTHDF1 upregulation repressed sevoflurane-induced activation of NLRP3 inflammation and pyroptosis in hippocampus tissues. Subsequently, YTHDF1 directly interacted to CREB mRNA to augment its stability and translation via a m6A-dependent manner, thus activating CREB/BDNF pathway. In addition, the inactivation of CREB/BDNF pathway could reverse the protective effects of YTHDF1 overexpression on sevoflurane-mediated neuronal damage and pyroptosis. These findings revealed that YTHDF1 improved sevoflurane-induced neuronal pyroptosis and cognitive dysfunction through activating CREB-BDNF signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.