ArticleMycorrhiza2023
Mycorrhizal response of Solanum tuberosum to homokaryotic versus dikaryotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 3D genome of Gigaspora margarita unveils stable chromatin and nucleolar organization and symbiont-dependent genome dynamics.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Mycelial dynamics in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Enhancing consistency in arbuscular mycorrhizal trait-based research to improve predictions of function.Mycorrhiza · 2025Review
- Review: roles of mycorrhizal symbioses and associated soil microbiomes in ecological restoration.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Intraspecies variation in mycorrhizal response of Medicago sativa to Rhizophagus irregularis under abiotic stress.Mycorrhiza · 2024Article
- Alternative splicing regulation in plants by SP7-like effectors from symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Review
- Divergent colonization traits, convergent benefits: different species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate Meloidogyne incognita damage in tomato.Mycorrhiza · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are obligate plant symbionts of most land plants. In these organisms, thousands of nuclei that are either genetically similar (homokaryotic) or derived from two distinct parents (dikaryotic) co-exist in a large syncytium. Here, we investigated the impact of these two nuclear organizations on the mycorrhizal response of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) by inoculating four potato cultivars with eight Rhizophagus irregularis strains individually (four homokaryotic and four dikaryotic). By evaluating plant and fungal fitness-related traits four months post inoculation, we found that AMF genetic organization significantly affects the mycorrhizal response of host plants. Specifically, homokaryotic strains lead to higher total, shoot, and tuber biomass and a higher number of tubers, compared to dikaryotic strains. However, fungal fitness-related traits showed no clear differences between homokaryotic and dikaryotic strains. Nucleotype content analysis of single spores confirmed that the nucleotype ratio of AMF heterokaryon spores can shift depending on host identity. Together, these findings continue to highlight significant ecological differences derived from the two distinct genetic organizations in AMF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.