Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571759›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Survey of Time Series Data Generation in IoT.

Chaochen Hu, Zihan Sun, Chao Li, Yong Zhang, Chunxiao Xing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaochen HuBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0379-5262
Zihan SunBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0009-0007-3911-9163
Chao LiBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-6127
Yong ZhangBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8803-2055
Chunxiao XingBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9390-3097

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China 22&ZD141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, with the rapid growth of the internet of things (IoT), massive amounts of time series data are being generated. Time series data play an important role in scientific and technological research for conducting experiments and studies to obtain solid and convincing results. However, due to privacy restrictions, limited access to time series data is always an obstacle. Moreover, the limited available open source data are often not suitable because of a small quantity and insufficient dimensionality and complexity. Therefore, time series data generation has become an imperative and promising solution. In this paper, we provide an overview of classical and state-of-the-art time series data generation methods in IoT. We classify the time series data generation methods into four major categories: rule-based methods, simulation-model-based methods, traditional machine-learning-based methods, and deep-learning-based methods. For each category, we first illustrate its characteristics and then describe the principles and mechanisms of the methods. Finally, we summarize the challenges and future directions of time series data generation in IoT. The systematic classification and evaluation will be a valuable reference for researchers in the time series data generation field.

Indexed as

categorizationdata generationIoTtime series

Identifiers

PMID37571759
PMCPMC10422358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.