Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571713›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Augmented Modulated Deep Learning Based Intelligent Predictive Model for Brain Tumor Detection Using GAN Ensemble.

Saswati Sahoo, Sushruta Mishra, Baidyanath Panda, Akash Kumar Bhoi, Paolo Barsocchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Saswati SahooSchool of Computer Engineering, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.
Sushruta MishraSchool of Computer Engineering, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-1100
Baidyanath PandaLTIMindtree, 1 American Row, 3rd Floor, Hartford, CT 06103, USA.
Akash Kumar BhoiDirectorate of Research, Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok 737102, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2759-3224
Paolo BarsocchiInstitute of Information Science and Technologies, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6862-7593
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" · ITKIIT University · INAmerican Foundation for the Blind · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor detection in the initial stage is becoming an intricate task for clinicians worldwide. The diagnosis of brain tumor patients is rigorous in the later stages, which is a serious concern. Although there are related pragmatic clinical tools and multiple models based on machine learning (ML) for the effective diagnosis of patients, these models still provide less accuracy and take immense time for patient screening during the diagnosis process. Hence, there is still a need to develop a more precise model for more accurate screening of patients to detect brain tumors in the beginning stages and aid clinicians in diagnosis, making the brain tumor assessment more reliable. In this research, a performance analysis of the impact of different generative adversarial networks (GAN) on the early detection of brain tumors is presented. Based on it, a novel hybrid enhanced predictive convolution neural network (CNN) model using a hybrid GAN ensemble is proposed. Brain tumor image data is augmented using a GAN ensemble, which is fed for classification using a hybrid modulated CNN technique. The outcome is generated through a soft voting approach where the final prediction is based on the GAN, which computes the highest value for different performance metrics. This analysis demonstrated that evaluation with a progressive-growing generative adversarial network (PGGAN) architecture produced the best result. In the analysis, PGGAN outperformed others, computing the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and negative predictive value (NPV) to be 98.85, 98.45%, 97.2%, 98.11%, and 98.09%, respectively. Additionally, a very low latency of 3.4 s is determined with PGGAN. The PGGAN model enhanced the overall performance of the identification of brain cell tissues in real time. Therefore, it may be inferred to suggest that brain tumor detection in patients using PGGAN augmentation with the proposed modulated CNN technique generates the optimum performance using the soft voting approach.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningBenchmarkingBrainHumansIntelligencebrain tumordeep learninggenerative adversarial networkmachine learningPGGANsoft voting

Identifiers

PMID37571713
PMCPMC10422344
OpenAlexW4385545958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.