ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Linguistic Explanations of Black Box Deep Learning Detectors on Simulated Aerial Drone Imagery.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning has become increasingly common in aerial imagery analysis. As its use continues to grow, it is crucial that we understand and can explain its behavior. One eXplainable AI (XAI) approach is to generate linguistic summarizations of data and/or models. However, the number of summaries can increase significantly with the number of data attributes, posing a challenge. Herein, we proposed a hierarchical approach for generating and evaluating linguistic statements of black box deep learning models. Our approach scores and ranks statements according to user-specified criteria. A systematic process was outlined for the evaluation of an object detector on a low altitude aerial drone. A deep learning model trained on real imagery was evaluated on a photorealistic simulated dataset with known ground truth across different contexts. The effectiveness and versatility of our approach was demonstrated by showing tailored linguistic summaries for different user types. Ultimately, this process is an efficient human-centric way of identifying successes, shortcomings, and biases in data and deep learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.