ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
High-Speed Network DDoS Attack Detection: A Survey.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of CW-RNN model in network attack detection and its promotion to the governance of international law.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Detecting DoS Attacks through Synthetic User Behavior with Long Short-Term Memory Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multi-Objective Task-Aware Offloading and Scheduling Framework for Internet of Things Logistics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Having a large number of device connections provides attackers with multiple ways to attack a network. This situation can lead to distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which can cause fiscal harm and corrupt data. Thus, irregularity detection in traffic data is crucial in detecting malicious behavior in a network, which is essential for network security and the integrity of modern Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). Nevertheless, studies have shown that current techniques are ineffective at detecting DDoS attacks on networks, especially in the case of high-speed networks (HSN), as detecting attacks on the latter is very complex due to their fast packet processing. This review aims to study and compare different approaches to detecting DDoS attacks, using machine learning (ML) techniques such as k-means, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Naive Bayes (NB) used in intrusion detection systems (IDSs) and flow-based IDSs, and expresses data paths for packet filtering for HSN performance. This review highlights the high-speed network accuracy evaluation factors, provides a detailed DDoS attack taxonomy, and classifies detection techniques. Moreover, the existing literature is inspected through a qualitative analysis, with respect to the factors extracted from the presented taxonomy of irregular traffic pattern detection. Different research directions are suggested to support researchers in identifying and designing the optimal solution by highlighting the issues and challenges of DDoS attacks on high-speed networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.