ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Survey of Image-Based Fault Monitoring in Additive Manufacturing: Recent Developments and Future Directions.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the Loop: High-Precision 3D Photofabrication in Living Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Vision-Based Artificial Intelligence for Adaptive Peen Forming: Sensing Architectures, Learning Models, and Closed-Loop Smart Manufacturing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D-Printed Drug Delivery and Screening Platforms for Bone Disease Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing/Bioprinting and Cellular Therapies for Regenerative Medicine: Current Advances.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has emerged as a transformative technology for various industries, enabling the production of complex and customized parts. However, ensuring the quality and reliability of AM parts remains a critical challenge. Thus, image-based fault monitoring has gained significant attention as an efficient approach for detecting and classifying faults in AM processes. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of image-based fault monitoring in AM, focusing on recent developments and future directions. Specifically, the proponents garnered relevant papers from 2019 to 2023, gathering a total of 53 papers. This paper discusses the essential techniques, methodologies, and algorithms employed in image-based fault monitoring. Furthermore, recent developments are explored such as the use of novel image acquisition techniques, algorithms, and methods. In this paper, insights into future directions are provided, such as the need for more robust image processing algorithms, efficient data acquisition and analysis methods, standardized benchmarks and datasets, and more research in fault monitoring. By addressing these challenges and pursuing future directions, image-based fault monitoring in AM can be enhanced, improving quality control, process optimization, and overall manufacturing reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.