ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Estimated Nucleotide Reconstruction Quality Symbols of Basecalling Tools for Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbiota variation inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Phased potato genome assembly and association genetics enable delineation of the H1 resistance locus against potato cyst nematodes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- T2TJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SKiM: accurately classifying metagenomic ONT reads in limited memory.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Decoding microbiome responses to quarantine potato wart disease: first insights into suppression and biocontrol by full-length 16S rRNA gene profiling and functional prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Nanopore sequencing of protozoa: Decoding biological information on a string of biochemical molecules into human-readable signals.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Eyeing DNA barcoding for species identification of fish larvae.Journal of fish biology · 2024Article
- Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024Article
- Cas9-targeted-based long-read sequencing for genetic screening ofFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, one of the fastest-growing DNA sequencing technologies is nanopore sequencing. One of the key stages involved in processing sequencer data is the basecalling process, where the input sequence of currents measured on the nanopores of the sequencer reproduces the DNA sequences, called DNA reads. Many of the applications dedicated to basecalling, together with the DNA sequence, provide the estimated quality of the reconstruction of a given nucleotide (quality symbols are contained on every fourth line of the FASTQ file; each nucleotide in the FASTQ file corresponds to exactly one estimated nucleotide reconstruction quality symbol). Herein, we compare the estimated nucleotide reconstruction quality symbols (signs from every fourth line of the FASTQ file) reported by other basecallers. The conducted experiments consisted of basecalling the same raw datasets from the nanopore device by other basecallers and comparing the provided quality symbols, denoting the estimated quality of the nucleotide reconstruction. The results show that the estimated quality reported by different basecallers may vary, depending on the tool used, particularly in terms of range and distribution. Moreover, we mapped basecalled DNA reads to reference genomes and calculated matched and mismatched rates for groups of nucleotides with the same quality symbol. Finally, the presented paper shows that the estimated nucleotide reconstruction quality reported in the basecalling process is not used in any investigated tool for processing nanopore DNA reads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.