Non-Directional Property of Human-Body Communication Channel for Implantable Device Application.

Jaehyo Jung, Daegil Choi, Da Eun Kim, Meina Li

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaehyo JungAI Healthcare Research Center, Department of IT Fusion Technology, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.

Daegil ChoiAI Healthcare Research Center, Department of IT Fusion Technology, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.

Da Eun KimAI Healthcare Research Center, Department of IT Fusion Technology, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9856-7248

Meina LiDepartment of Instrument Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we present the properties of a communication channel used for implantable devices. The human-body communication (HBC) channel was proposed for data communication in implantable devices. The impulse response was measured using a channel-mimicking model, which mimics electrical losses caused by human body tissues. Furthermore, we compared two types of channel-mimicking models to evaluate their applicability depending on the measurement environment. The resultant impulse responses of the HBC channel showed that HBC does not cause severe changes in the channel properties even when the implantable device is rotated.

Indexed as

Human BodyWireless TechnologyCommunicationElectricityHumansProstheses and Implantschannel measurementhuman–body communicationimplantable deviceimpulse response

Identifiers

PMID37571536

DOI10.3390/s23156754

PMCPMC10422461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.