Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3757152›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology1986

A cellular analysis of long-term haematopoietic damage in mice after repeated treatment with cyclophosphamide.

G Molineux, C Xu, J Hendry, N G Testa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G Molineux
C Xu
J Hendry
N G Testa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following repeated treatment of mice with cyclophosphamide (5 X 200 mg/kg) it was found that slight, but significant, residual marrow damage persisted for at least half the lifespan of the animals. This long-term damage occurred despite preferential sparing of those multi-potential haematopoietic cells (CFU-S) that had a high self-renewal capacity after each step of the multistep regimen and despite a smaller CFU-S kill after each successive dose. The damage was characterized by low mean numbers of CFU-S and stromal colony-forming cells (CFU-F) which were around 70% of control values. Examination of individual animals revealed that the majority had slightly subnormal numbers of CFU-S and CFU-F, with only a few suffering a more severe injury, including 8% of mice with clinical hypoplasia or myelodysplasia.

Indexed as

AnimalsColony-Forming Units AssayCyclophosphamideFemaleHematopoietic Stem CellsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsTime FactorsCyclophosphamide

Identifiers

PMID3757152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.