Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571400›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

A Systematic Literature Review of Nutrition Interventions Implemented to Address Food Insecurity as a Social Determinant of Health.

Kennedy Norris, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Heidi Reis, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07221045 (PhytoRx Families), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07221045 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PhytoRx Families: A Pilot Test Study to Address Food Security and Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Rural North Carolina

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorth Carolina State UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsDiet, Healthy, Health Behavior, Blood Pressure, Diabetes Mellitus RiskArmsPhytoRx Families: A Pilot Test to Address Food Security in Rural North Carolina
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Interventions for positive parental feeding practices in low-income households: a scoping review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. National Data on the Prevalence of Food Insecurity in Australia: Implications for Health Promotion.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Food inequity and insecurity and MASLD: burden, challenges, and interventions.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kennedy NorrisDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Stephanie Jilcott PittsDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Heidi ReisLaupus Health Sciences Library, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0589-3106
Lindsey Haynes-MaslowDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-1478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicy initiatives have provided funding for non-acute nutrition interventions to address food insecurity as a social determinant of health, but more research is needed to understand the outcomes of these initiatives in order to determine the areas of highest impact. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes that were assessed in three nutrition interventions (produce prescription programs, medically tailored meals, and community supported agriculture) that aim to address food insecurity as a social determinant of health, and this was undertaken in order to identify future areas of study that can heighten impact.

methodsThis systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria. A list of search terms and keywords were compiled by the research team. A Boolean search was conducted from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2023 in the PubMed advanced search database.

resultsA total of 1015 articles were initially pulled from the PubMed database, and, after a screening process, 21 articles were included in our review. Nineteen of the articles focused on adult populations or families and two focused on children. The main outcomes assessed were changes in self-reported dietary intake, while a few of the articles addressed feasibility and cost-related outcomes.

conclusionsMore research is needed to assess whether nutritional interventions to address food insecurity as a social determinant of health are feasible and more cost effective in the long term. Additionally, more work should be conducted in pediatric populations, which could have a robust return on investment in terms of both healthcare utilization and healthcare expenditure.

Indexed as

Social Determinants of HealthSocial FactorsAdultChildFood InsecurityHumanscommunity-supported agriculturefood insecuritymedically tailored mealsproduce prescriptionssocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID37571400
PMCPMC10421408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.