Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37571331›Full record

ReviewNutrients2023

Plant-Based Dairy Alternatives Contribute to a Healthy and Sustainable Diet.

Winston J Craig, Virginia Messina, Ian Rowland, Angelina Frankowska, Jane Bradbury, Sergiy Smetana, Elphee Medici

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Winston J CraigCenter for Nutrition, Healthy Lifestyle, and Disease Prevention, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 93254, USA.
Virginia MessinaNutrition Consultant, Nutrition Matters, Inc., Pittsfield, MA 01201, USA.
Ian RowlandDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8738-4550
Angelina FrankowskaIndependent Research Consultant, Environmental Sustainability Assessment, Bedford MK45 4BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1483-114X
Jane BradburySchool of Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5883-708X
Sergiy SmetanaGerman Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.v.), 49610 Quakenbrueck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-0521
Elphee MediciNutrition & Sustainable Diets Consultant, Nutrilicious Ltd., London N2 0EF, UK.
Edge Hill University · GBGerman Institute of Food Technologies · DELoma Linda University · USUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based foods are increasing in popularity as more and more people are concerned about personal and planetary health. The consumption of plant-based dairy alternatives (PBDAs) has assumed a more significant dietary role in populations shifting to more sustainable eating habits. Plant-based drinks (PBDs) made from soya and other legumes have ample protein levels. PBDs that are appropriately fortified have adequate levels of important vitamins and minerals comparable to dairy milk. For the PBDs examined, the greenhouse gas emissions were diminished by 59-71% per 250 mL, and the land use and eutrophication impact was markedly less than the levels displayed by dairy milk. The water usage for the oat and soya drinks, but not rice drinks, was substantially lower compared to dairy milk. When one substitutes the 250 mL serving of dairy milk allowed within the EAT Lancet Planetary Health Diet for a fortified plant-based drink, we found that the nutritional status is not compromised but the environmental footprint is reduced. Combining a nutrient density score with an environmental index can easily lead to a misclassification of food when the full nutrition profile is not utilized or only a selection of environmental factors is used. Many PBDAs have been categorized as ultra-processed foods (UPFs). Such a classification, with the implied adverse nutritional and health associations, is inconsistent with current findings regarding the nutritional quality of such products and may discourage people from transitioning to a plant-based diet with its health and environmental advantages.

Indexed as

DietNutritional StatusDairy ProductsDiet, HealthyHealth StatusHumansNutritive Valuecalciumdairy alternativesenvironmental footprintiodineplant-based drinksproteinsustainabilityultra-processed foodvitamin B12vitamin D

Identifiers

PMID37571331
PMCPMC10421454
OpenAlexW4385422892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.